Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. S. S. Construction Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Suit upon a promissory note made by the S. S. Construction Company to the plaintiff, and indorsed by the defendants, the San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Company and J. G. and I. N. Day, and which also bears words of guaranty signed by appellant Behrend Joost. Hpon the trial; the action was dismissed as to all the defendants except Mr. Joost, and findings and judgment were against him, and he appeals from the judgment and an order denying a new trial.
The note here in suit was given in renewal of a prior note made by said construction company and indorsed by the railway company and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barnes v. SabronNevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1868
- Hook v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Wedderspoon v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Edwards v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Garland v. GainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.