Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
On application to the District Court of Appeal the award of the Industrial Accident Commission involved herein was affirmed, but by a divided court. We granted a petition to have the cause transferred to this court that we might give the majority and minority opinions ren-. dered in the District Court of Appeal further consideration and study. Upon re-examination of the case, we are of the opinion that the majority opinion correctly states and applies the law applicable to the facts here. We, therefore, approve the same and adopt it as the opinion of this court. It was prepared by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- MacPherson v. West Coast Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.