Wedderspoon v. Rogers
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. • ■
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.:
This is an action upon a promissory note by the payee against the maker. The complaint avers the making and delivery of the note by the defendant to plaintiff, setting out a copy, then avers “ that plaintiff is now the owner and holder of said promissory note,” that no'part had been paid, etc., and prays judgment for the amount due. The complaint is verified. The answer denies “ upon information and belief that the plaintiff is the owner of the note,” but does not deny any other allegation. It then affirmatively avers on information and belief, that one R. S. Corning…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Russell v. ClappNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Doe v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Seeley v. EngellNew York Supreme Court · 1854
- Bentley v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by12 opinions
- Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1868
- Curtin v. KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. S. S. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.