Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Nelson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtShebwood, J.

Plaintiffs, merchants doing business in-Cleveland, Ohio, brought this suit against the defendants, who formerly did business at Ishpeming under the firm: name of Nelson, Braastad & Co., in assumpsit, declaring-upon the common counts, and gave notice under same that they would offer in evidence on th.e trial, a note, of which, the following is a copy :

“$200. IshpemiNG-, Mich., July 3,1878.

Seven months after date we promise to pay to the order of Edwards, Townsend & Co., two hundred dollars, at Bank: of Ishpeming, Mich. Yalue received.

NelsoN, Bbaastad & Co.”

¥

Defendant Braastad appeared and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. ArdisMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reedy v. GoodinMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Crampton v. CramptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bagaeff v. ProkopikMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. S. S. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Needham v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API