Legal Opinion
Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1956No. Civ. 16986PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Appellants, owners of an on-sale liquor license at “Murphy’s Club,” Pittsburg, were accused and found guilty by the State Board of Equalization of violating subdivisions (a) and (b) of section 24200, Business and Professions Code, rule 143 of the board, and article XX, section 22, Constitution, in that they permitted female employees to accept alcoholic beverages purchased on the premises.
On a review by the superior court of the proceedings before the board the court found that the decision of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 2 was supported by the weight of the evidence and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Marcucci v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Foster v. Bd. of Police Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- DeMartini v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Greenblatt v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Stoumen v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.