Legal Opinion
Weissensee v. Chronicle Publishing Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 1976No. Civ. 36504PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (H. C.), J.
Appellant had a written contract with respondent The San Francisco Newspaper Printing Company, Inc., (hereafter Printing Company) for the distribution of the San Francisco Chronicle in an area of Marin County. Respondent Printing Company terminated the contract and demanded return of the customer list. Appellant refused to comply with this demand unless paid $10 per name. Printing Company reconstructed the list with help from appellant’s drivers who were hired to expend extra time in this work. Printing Company deducted this cost from appellant’s bond.
Appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Gordon v. LandauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- A. B. C. Distributing Co. v. Distillers Distributing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Willard M. Noble and Etta M. Noble v. McClatchy Newspapers, a Corporation, Willard M. Noble and Etta M. Noble v. McClatchy Newspapers, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Lowell v. Mother's Cake & Cookie Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Pierce v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.