Legal Opinion

Childers v. Childers

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1946No. Civ. 15214PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

At the conclusion of the trial of this action, which was had before the court without a jury, findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived by both parties, whereupon an interlocutory judgment of divorce was awarded to plaintiff. Defendant has appealed on the judgment roll and a transcript of the evidence introduced at the trial. The only point raised is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the findings that must be implied in support of the judgment.

*591. Assumptions and implications when findings are waived. Since findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived every…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Arthur C. Harvey Co. v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Cardenas v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API