Willard M. Noble and Etta M. Noble v. McClatchy Newspapers, a Corporation, Willard M. Noble and Etta M. Noble v. McClatchy Newspapers, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and GRAY,* District Judge. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Willard Noble and his wife, Etta, were distributors of the Sacramento Bee newspaper. Their distributorship was cancelled. They brought this private antitrust action against McClatchy Newspapers, publisher of the Bee, and seven individuals.1
Three claims are at issue on these appeals: First, that defendants violated section 1 of the Sherman Act to plaintiffs’ injury by terminating plaintiffs’ distributorship; second, assuming the lawfulness of the termination of plaintiffs’ distributorship that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Douglas K. Knutson v. The Daily Review, Inc., a Corporation, the Daily Review, Inc., a Corporation v. Douglas K. KnutsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Response of Carolina, Inc. v. Leasco Response, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Gte Sylvania Incorporated v. Continental T v. Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Andre Brooks v. Charlotte Cook Mark L. Mechanic County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.