Legal Opinion
Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 1982No. Civ. 45495PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
Respondents brought an action against appellants for 1) “Interference with Advantageous Business and Contractual Relations,” and 2) violatiohs of the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16700 et seq.). The tort action was abandoned after the trial court’s ruling that the damages sought by it were de minimis. The Cartwright Act antitrust case proceeded to jury trial, after which a verdict and judgment in favor of respondents Kolling and Fisher in the amounts of $102,915.23 and $62,471.89, respectively, were entered.
Two separate claims comprise the antitrust action which is…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Cellular Plus, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.