Shook v. Jacuzzi
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRAPER, P. J.
This appeal represents but one more unsuccessful effort to evade the clear statutory provisions which make workers’ compensation procedures the sole remedy of an employee against his employer in industrial injury cases.
Both plaintiffs were employed by defendant International Manufacturing Company, whose president, Jacuzzi, is joined as a defendant. Each complaint alleges that plaintiff, acting in the course and scope of his employment, was injured while operating a machine used by International in its manufacture of automobile wheels. Each claimed and recovered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Dixon v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Williams v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Douglas v. E. & J. GALLO WINERYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- D'Angona v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Royster v. MontanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Bonus-Bilt, Inc. v. United Grocers, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.