Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Ford Motor Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1975No. Civ. 34754PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Plaintiffs, the widow and minor children of Norman Dixon, deceased, commenced a wrongful death action against the latter’s employer, Ford Motor Company, and a nurse and “orderly” employed by it. Concluding that plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy was under the state’s Workmen’s Compensation Act, the superior court granted the company’s motion for summary judgment and rendered judgment accordingly. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The material and undisputed facts before the superior court follow. Ford Motor Company maintained a “Plant Aid Station” at which was provided “emergency first…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Russell v. OrrMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. McCormick v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API