Legal Opinion

Allen v. G.D. Searle & Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 3, 1989No. Civil 86-1402-FR, 86-1659-FRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, Judge:

The matters before the court are the following motions:

1. Plaintiff Debra Allen’s motion to strike G.D. Searle & Co.’s (Searle) affirmative defenses, or for partial summary judgment on those defenses (# );

2. Plaintiff Donna Keys’ motion to strike Searle’s affirmative defenses, or for partial summary judgment on those defenses (# );

3. The motion of both plaintiffs for de-

claratory judgment or for partial summary judgment concerning Searle’s duty to warn plaintiffs directly (# ); and

4. Searle’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment (on 11 separate issues) (# ).

Background…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Lovejoy v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. Beale v. Biomet, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API