Legal Opinion
Bravman v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 24, 1994No. 89 Civ. 3444 (RWS)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiffs Aaron Bravman (“Bravman”) and his wife Muriel. Defendant also moves in limine to preclude all evidence concerning a third party’s suicide attempt and studies concerning the noise of the heart valve. For the reasons set forth below, Baxter’s motion for summary judgment is granted. The motion in limine concerning the suicide is moot as Plaintiffs have conceded at oral argument of this…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Horowitz v. Stryker Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Subby MARTELLO, Appellant, v. CIBA VISION CORPORATION, a Georgia Corporation, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Ministry of Health v. Shiley Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1994
- Talbott v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Montoya v. Mentor Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.