Legal Opinion

Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1994No. 80662PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

Plaintiffs pende implant failed and had to be surgically removed. He brought this products liability suit against the manufacturer. The jury reached a defendant’s verdict and the plaintiff appeals, raising three issues for our resolution: (1) whether the jury was properly instructed on the law of “unavoidably unsafe products” as that rule appears in Comment k of the Restatement of Torts, (2) whether evidence of a doctor’s prior acts were admissible under 12 O.S. § 2404(B), and (3) whether a witness was properly qualified to testify as an expert. We affirm.

Robert Tansy became…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Fox v. MizeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. DeCorte v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API