Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice:
Plaintiffs pende implant failed and had to be surgically removed. He brought this products liability suit against the manufacturer. The jury reached a defendant’s verdict and the plaintiff appeals, raising three issues for our resolution: (1) whether the jury was properly instructed on the law of “unavoidably unsafe products” as that rule appears in Comment k of the Restatement of Torts, (2) whether evidence of a doctor’s prior acts were admissible under 12 O.S. § 2404(B), and (3) whether a witness was properly qualified to testify as an expert. We affirm.
Robert Tansy became…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Desiderio Cartagena and Domingo Alvarez, Carlos A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez v. Pedro N. Soto and Edwin F. GotayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Fox v. MizeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- DeCorte v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.