Legal Opinion
Humes v. Clinton
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 25, 1990No. 63,436PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Herd, J.:
This is a medical malpractice and products liability case brought by Brenda and Bennie Humes on behalf of their nonviable fetus, as heirs at law of the fetus, and individually against Dale L. Clinton, M.D., and ALZA Corporation. Appellants Clinton and ALZA Corporation have perfected an interlocutory appeal of the district court’s ruling denying them summary judgment on appellees Humes’ claim for wrongful death, pain and suffering, strict liability, and negligence per se. Appellees Humes cross-appeal the district court ruling granting summary…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- John Crumpton, IV v. Daryl Gates Tom Bradley Tom Reddin Ed Davis Herbert Boeckmann Maxwell E. Greenberg Barbara L. Schlei Robert TalcottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Sawyer v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.