Legal Opinion
In Re Cate
California Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1929No. Docket No. Crim. 2734PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This matter is before this court for determination after a decision by the District Court of Appeal in and for the Second Appellate District, Division Two, denying the application of the petitioner herein for reinstatement and re-admission to practice as' an attorney and counselor at law, filed in said court on September 26, 1928, and upon which a petition for hearing herein was granted. Clyde E. Cate was admitted to practice his said profession after examination by said District Court of Appeal on June 14, 1912, and thereupon entered and for some years engaged in the practice of the law. On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- In Re Estate of RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Danford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- In Re CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Warner Lambert Co. v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.