In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Bruen
Washington Supreme Court
Petition filed in the supreme court December 24, 1917, to review tbe findings of tbe state board of law examiners in disbarment proceedings.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This proceeding was instituted under the Laws of 1917, ch. 115, p. 421. The complaint in disbarment by tbe chairman of tbe board of law examiners alleges that Bruen’s “conduct of tbe affairs of said Charlotte Isom constituted unprofessional conduct as an attorney at law and involved moral turpitude to such an extent that his right to practice his profession as an attorney at law in the state of Washington should be revoked.” The matter was brought on for bearing before the chairman of the board of law examiners, who beard the testimony at Seattle, Washington, in October, 1917.
*474After taking the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- In re Proceedings for the Disbarment of LambuthWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- In re Proceedings for the Disbarment of RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- In re WaughWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State Board of Medical Examiners v. MacyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Short v. DemopolisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.