Legal Opinion
Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1980No. Nos. 80-191 and 80-349PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
For the reasons set forth, we affirm the commission’s order in its entirety.
I
Appellants contend that IL U. 49O9.~9 renders invalid the permanent rate increases ordered herein within Columbus until March 30,1980. R. C. 4909.39, in relevant part, provides:
*73“If the public utilities commission, after the hearing referred to in Sections 4909.34 to 4909.36 of the Revised Code, is of the opinion that the rate* * * so fixed by ordinance is or will be unjust, unreasonable, or insufficient to yield reasonable compensation for the service, the commission shall fix and determine the just and reasonable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Franklin County Welfare Rights Organization v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Masury Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- LEGISLATIVE UTIL. CONSUMERS'COUNCIL v. Granite State Elec. Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.