Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1979No. 78-679PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue raised by the instant cause is whether the rate increase levied against the utility’s Columbus customers is reasonable and lawful. More specifically, the question is whether there is sufficient probative evidence in the record to support the commission’s choice of an allocation formula and its valuation of the utility’s “used and useful” property.

This court’s standard! of review for a determination by the Public Utilities Commission is set forth in R. C. 4903.13.

R. C. 4903.13 provides:

“A final order made by the Public Utilities Commission shall be reversed, vacated, or modified by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Delphos v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Armco, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API