Legal Opinion

Ex Parte City of Guntersville v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 22, 1998No. 1961595PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The central issue presented in this case is whether §25-5-77 (a), Ala. Code 1975, requires an employer and/or its workers' compensation insurance carrier to furnish a disabled claimant with a motor vehicle. That section provides, in part:

"In addition to the compensation provided in this article and Article 4 of this chapter, the employer . . . shall pay an amount not to exceed the prevailing rate or maximum schedule of fees as established herein of reasonably necessary medical and surgical treatment and attention, physical rehabilitation, medicine, medical and surgical supplies, crutches,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Riley v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. McDonald v. Brunswick Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Manpower Temporary Services v. SiosonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Carroll v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Osorio v. K & D ERECTORS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Perry & Williams, Inc. v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Alabama Forest Products Industry Workmen's Compensation Self-Insurers' Fund v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API