Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CASTILLE.
This Court granted review to determine: (1) whether a van modified to make it wheelchair accessible for a workers’ compensation claimant rendered a quadriplegic by a work-related injury is an “orthopedic appliance” under Section 306(f.l)(l)(ii) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), 77 P.S. § 531(l)(ii); and (2) whether the cost containment provision in Section 306(f.l)(3)(i) of the Act, 77 P.S. § 531(3)(i), is applicable in this instance. We hold that the van, and not merely the wheelchair lift and modifications installed in the van, may qualify as an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Fletcher v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Whitfield v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Lynnebrook and Woodbrook Associates, Lp Ex Rel. Lynnebrook Manor, Inc. v. MillersvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.