Legal Opinion

Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 2008No. 148 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CASTILLE.

This Court granted review to determine: (1) whether a van modified to make it wheelchair accessible for a workers’ compensation claimant rendered a quadriplegic by a work-related injury is an “orthopedic appliance” under Section 306(f.l)(l)(ii) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”), 77 P.S. § 531(l)(ii); and (2) whether the cost containment provision in Section 306(f.l)(3)(i) of the Act, 77 P.S. § 531(3)(i), is applicable in this instance. We hold that the van, and not merely the wheelchair lift and modifications installed in the van, may qualify as an…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Fletcher v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Whitfield v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Lynnebrook and Woodbrook Associates, Lp Ex Rel. Lynnebrook Manor, Inc. v. MillersvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API