Legal Opinion

Perry & Williams, Inc. v. Mitchell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 17, 2006No. 2050508PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

989 So.2d 1074 (2006)

PERRY & WILLIAMS, INC.

v.

William Earl MITCHELL.

2050508.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 17, 2006.

William H. Webster of Webster, Henry, Lyons & White, P.C., Montgomery, for appellant.

J. Greg Allen of Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., Montgomery, for appellee.

PITTMAN, Judge.

In May 1999, the Montgomery Circuit Court entered a judgment finding that William Earl Mitchell ("the employee") had suffered a disabling injury in July 1996 from inhaling toxic fumes while in the course of his employment with Perry & Williams, Inc. ("the employer"), so as to…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Crawley; Concurrence · Thompson; Concurrence · Bryan; Concurrence · Murdock.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weakland v. Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Farmers Ins. Exch. v. RaineCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Ex Parte McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Camp v. Deseret Mutual Benefit Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ex Parte City of Guntersville v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. WilliamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Perry & Williams, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API