Manpower Temporary Services v. Sioson
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
Is a workers’ compensation insurer required to provide a van (the insurer agrees to convert and equip it) for a worker who became a quadriplegic as a result of injuries sustained on the job? Under the extraordinary circumstances appearing here, we think the industrial commissioner was not incorrect in answering yes. A threshold question is the insurer’s challenge to the statutory avenue chosen to present the key question. Both parties appeal from the district court’s decision on judicial review. That decision allowed most, but not all, the commissioner’s award. We affirm on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Mortimer v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. BradenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Graves v. Eagle Iron WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Kostelac v. Feldman's, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bell Bros. Heating & Air Conditioning v. GwinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Quaker Oats Co. v. CihaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Beelman Trucking v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Mickey v. City Wide MaintenanceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.