Legal Opinion
R & T Construction Co. v. Judge
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 22, 1991No. 97 September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
This workers’ compensation case concerns the scope of an employer’s obligation to provide medical treatment and services under Maryland Code (1957, 1985 Repl.Vol.), Art. 101, § 37(a). The principal issues are whether the complainant, a quadriplegic, is entitled to a specially equipped van, to additional remodeling and enlarging of his residence, and to the cost of electricity consumed in powering certain appliances used by him. The Workmen’s Compensation Commission denied all three requests; the Circuit Court for Montgomery County reversed, and the Court of Special Appeals…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Derebery v. Pitt County Fire MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Johnson v. Skelly Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Philip Electronics North America v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Quaker Oats Co. v. CihaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Downey Communications, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.