Legal Opinion

Stein v. Burt & Vetterlein, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 1997No. 9501-00092; 9002-01058; CA A93942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant Burt & Vetterlein, P.C., formerly known as Burt, Vetterlein & Bushnell, P.C., appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for attorney fees and the court’s allowance of attorney fees to plaintiff George Stein. We reverse the award of attorney fees to plaintiff and otherwise affirm.

Plaintiff George Stein initiated this action pursuant to ORCP 71 C, seeking relief from the judgment entered in another case, Burt, Vetterlein & Bushnell, P.C. v. Stein, 117 Or App 363, 844 P2d 239 (1992), rev den 316 Or 527 (1993). In the earlier action, the law firm Burt, Vetterlein & Bushnell…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Lawrence v. PeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Domingo v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Condliff v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Mulier v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Wedemeyer v. Nike Ihm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Lewis v. The State of NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API