Legal Opinion

Condliff v. Priest

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 29, 1986No. A8502-00807; CA A37423PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an amended judgment which modified a final judgment entered in favor of plaintiff by striking punitive damages against defendant Western Surety Company (Western). We reverse.

Plaintiff sued car dealer Paul Priest Motors (Priest), car salesman Daniel Priest and Western, Priest’s surety, 1 for fraud and unlawful trade practices. He sought $1,100 in compensatory damages, $7,000 in punitive damage, $4,000 in attorney’s fees and costs. Under the local circuit court rules, the case was subject to mandatory arbitration because the prayer was for less than $15,000. 2 All parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Butler v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Matter of Marriage of VinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Stevenson v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Braat v. AndrewsOregon Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Renninger v. RenningerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Patrick v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. MBNA America Bank, N. A. v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Kneefel v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. City of Canby v. RinkesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API