Legal Opinion

Marquam Investment Corp. v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 5, 1978No. 157-589, CA 8343PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant-tenant appeals from a judgment entered for plaintiff-landlord in district court on a forcible entry and detainer action (FED). Defendant makes several assignments of error.

INCONSISTENT VERDICT

Plaintiff filed the FED action following a 30-day notice of termination. Defendant answered alleging retaliation as an affirmative defense pursuant to ORS 91.865. Defendant also counterclaimed for damages based on: (1) retaliation, (2) use of a prohibited rental provision and (3) the plaintiffs failure to maintain the dwelling unit in a habitable condition.

The jury returned the following…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Johnson v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Smith v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Morrill v. RountreeOregon Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Boers v. Payline Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. City of Portland v. George D. Ward & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API