Marquam Investment Corp. v. Myers
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant-tenant appeals from a judgment entered for plaintiff-landlord in district court on a forcible entry and detainer action (FED). Defendant makes several assignments of error.
INCONSISTENT VERDICT
Plaintiff filed the FED action following a 30-day notice of termination. Defendant answered alleging retaliation as an affirmative defense pursuant to ORS 91.865. Defendant also counterclaimed for damages based on: (1) retaliation, (2) use of a prohibited rental provision and (3) the plaintiffs failure to maintain the dwelling unit in a habitable condition.
The jury returned the following…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Johnson v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Smith v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Morrill v. RountreeOregon Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Boers v. Payline Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- City of Portland v. George D. Ward & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.