Legal Opinion

Domingo v. Anderson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1997No. CC 9306-03850; CA A84591; SC S43252PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

Plaintiffs Domingo gave defendant Anderson a trust deed to secure payment of plaintiffs’ debt to him. The deed named Anderson as its beneficiary. Plaintiffs defaulted. The property was sold at a trustee’s sale. Anderson made the highest bid, thereby obtaining the property.

Plaintiffs then brought the present action, claiming that the notices of sale and the sale were improper. Specifically, plaintiffs sought damages and attorney fees from Anderson under the contractual terms of the trust deed and the provisions of ORS 20.096.

The trust deed provides that grantor (i.e., plaintiffs):

“[A]grees * *…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Executive Management Corporation v. JuckettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Parquit Corporation v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Associated Oregon Veterans v. Department of Veterans' AffairsOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. ZurlindenOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Strunk v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bennett v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Colby v. GunsonOregon Supreme Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API