Legal Opinion

Wedemeyer v. Nike Ihm, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 2022No. A157008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

781 Argued and submitted January 5; supplemental judgment awarding defendant attorney fees reversed and remanded, otherwise affirmed May 25, 2022. Michele R. WEDEMEYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIKE IHM, INC., a Missouri corporation, Defendant-Respondent. Washington County Circuit Court C132504CV; A157008

513 P3d 610

Plaintiff worked as a production manager for defendant Nike for eight years until their relationship deteriorated, leading to this lawsuit. After the judgment was entered, defendant requested and was awarded attorney fees. Plaintiff chal- lenges the trial court’s order awarding…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mulier v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Page v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Eklof v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Carter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API