Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Peel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1980No. 77-2774, CA 12896PublishedCited by 27 opinions

BUTTLER, J.

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Defendants appeal an adverse decree entered in this Declaratory Judgment proceeding. The issues presented involve a dispute over the existence and extent of an easement retained by plaintiffs 1 when they sold a portion of their land to defendants, and over the existence and extent of a right of first refusal in defendants with respect to adjoining property retained by plaintiffs. Defendants also contend that the trial court erred in allowing attorney’s fees to plaintiffs under a contract provision allowing such fees to the "prevailing party” in any dispute involving the contract. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pickinpaugh v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Garza v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Knappenberger v. Cascade Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mascall v. EriksonOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Franklin v. Western Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Arkla Energy Resources v. Roye Realty & Developing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Wescold, Inc. v. Logan International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Arkla Energy Resources v. Roye Realty And DevelopingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API