Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Mallory v. Public Employees Retirement Board
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1998No. 97-231PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The parties present a number of arguments for our consideration. We have carefully reviewed these arguments and have conducted a thorough review of the record. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and grant appellant’s requested writ of mandamus.'
I
Appellees concede that an action in mandamus is the appropriate remedy to determine appellant’s claimed entitlement to service credit in PERS. See, e.g., State ex rel. Ryan v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 362, 364, 643 N.E.2d 1122, 1125; McAuliffe v. Bd. of Pub. Emp. Retirement Sys. of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin County Board of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wilkes Associates v. Hollander Industries Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- BP Communications Alaska, Inc. v. Central Collection AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Reali, Giampetro & Scott v. Society National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.