Legal Opinion

Reali, Giampetro & Scott v. Society National Bank

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1999No. Case No. 97 CA 2PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vukovich, Judge.

The following appeal arises from the decision of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in that no genuine issue as to any material fact was felt to exist as related to allegations of tortious interference with a contract and tortious interference with a business relationship. For the reasons set forth below, the decision of the trial court is affirmed.

I. FACTS

On July 7, 1995, appellant, Reali, Giampetro & Scott, a professional corporation, filed a complaint against Society National Bank, appellee, sounding in tortious interference with a contract.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kenty v. Transamerica Premium InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Farmers Market Drive-In Shopping Ctrs. v. Magana, 06ap-532 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Fouty v. Ohio Department of Youth ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Union Savings Bank v. Lawyers Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Deboer Structures (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Shaffer Tent & Awning Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. Havensure, L.L.C. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API