Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1997No. 97-233PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Per curiam

Prohibition: General Rules

In their propositions of law, relators assert that they are entitled to a writ of prohibition because the common pleas court lacks jurisdiction over the claims in the underlying action.

In order for a writ of prohibition to issue, relators must establish that (1) the common pleas court is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) the exercise of that power is unauthorized by law, and (3) denying the writ will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Franklin County Law Enforcement Ass'n v. Fraternal Order of Police, Capital City Lodge No. 9Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Fairview General Hospital v. FletcherOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State ex rel. First New Shiloh Baptist Church v. MeagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Cleveland v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Mallory v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Page v. RileyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API