BP Communications Alaska, Inc. v. Central Collection Agency
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Patton, Judge.
The affiliates (usually called “subsidiaries”) of Ohio corporations can choose to pay municipal income taxes by consolidating their returns with other affiliates of the parent corporation. After, having filed consolidated tax returns in the city of Cleveland for nine years, six affiliates of BP America asked the administrator of the Central Collection Agency (“CCA”) for permission to deconsolidate their returns because they no longer transacted any business nor had any connection with the city. The administrator denied permission, so the affiliates brought a declaratory judgment…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Mills v. Whitehouse Trucking Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- Nemazee v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hanna v. Groom, 07ap-502 (2-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Avery v. Rossford, Ohio Transportation Improvement DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Layla Story-Bernardo v. Government of Guam, Lourdes A. Leon GuerreroSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
- Koehring v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Correction, 06ap-396 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.