State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County Board
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Motion to Intervene
As a preliminary matter, Uffman-Kirsch cites Civ.R. 24 in support of her motion to intervene. See S.CtPrac.R. X(2) (“All original actions shall proceed under the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, unless clearly inapplicable.”). Civ.R. 24 is generally liberally construed in favor of intervention. See, e.g., State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Gwin (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 245, 247, 594 N.E.2d 616, 619. Nevertheless, Civ.R. 24(C) sets forth the following requirements for a motion to intervene:
“A person desiring to intervene shall serve a motion to intervene upon the parties as provided…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Blankenship v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Stoll v. Logan County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.