Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grant county, Hill, J., entered October 28, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, awarding damages in condemnation proceedings, after trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Following our decision in this case on a former appeal, 107 Wash. 378, 181 Pac. 898, another trial was had, resulting in a verdict fixing .the value of the property sought to be taken at $180,000. From a judgment thereon, plaintiff appeals.
Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond is defective. We have heretofore held that the eminent domain statute, being complete in itself and containing provisions specifying how appeals shall be effected, the general statute relating to appeals does not apply. Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co., 22 Wash. 158, 60 Pac. 158;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brack v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
- Czarecki v. Seattle & San Francisco Railway & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Port Angeles Pacific Railroad v. CookeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re Crab Creek and Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Longview, Portland & Northern Railroad v. SettleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Pacific County v. North Pacific Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.