Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal 'from a judgmeut of the superior court for Gfrant county, Hill, J., entered October 25,1920, awarding damages in condemnation proceedings, after a trial to the court and a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
This controversy is now before this court for the eighth time and its history can be found in State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior Court, 70 Wash. 442, 126 Pac. 945; State ex rel. Grant Realty Co. v. Superior Court, 76 Wash. 376, 136 Pac. 144; State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior Court, 81 Wash. 690,143 Pac. 310; Grant Realty Co. v. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie, 96 Wash. 616, 165 Pac. 495; Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pac. R. Co., 107 Wash. 378, 181 Pac. 898; Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pac. R. Co., 110 Wash. 467, 188 Pac. 527. It is an action for the condemnation of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Grant Realty Co. v. Ham, Yearsley & RyrieWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. Grant Realty Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Crab Creek and Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Hutchison v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966