Legal Opinion

Port Angeles Pacific Railroad v. Cooke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1905No. 5297PublishedCited by 15 opinions

ÍAppeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county, Hatch, J., entered August 12, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury, awarding damages for land appropriated under the right of eminent domain. Motion to recall remittitur.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was originally commenced in the superior court of Clallam county, by appellant as petitioner, for the purpose of condemning a right of way for appellant’s use over certain real estate belonging to respondents. Hpon trial without a jury, the court ascertained the separate damages sustained by the several respondents, and entered judgment for said damages as follows: (1) In favor of the Port Angeles Land and Trust Company and the Port Angeles Townsite Improvement Company, for $50; (2) in favor of the Pilion Mill and Lumber Company, in the sum of $256, for land and timber sought to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bellingham Bay & British Columbia Railroad v. StrandWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Titlow v. Cascade Oatmeal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Peel v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Kosten v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State ex rel. Struntz v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. North Coast Railroad v. AumillerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Port Townsend Southern Railroad v. BarbareWashington Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API