Legal Opinion

Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1919No. 14942PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of tbe superior court for Grant county, Hill, J., entered February 26, 1918, awarding damages in condemnation proceedings, after a trial to tbe court and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, C. J.

The chief question in this case is the proper measure of compensation and damages in a condemnation proceeding.

On September 9, 1913, judgment was entered in the superior court for Grant county whereby 16 and 2/10 acres of land on Moses Lake, in that county, were decreed subject to appropriation for a public use by the respondent, subject to the right of the respondent to acquire the same by condemnation, for the construction and maintenance of a dam site. That judgment was entered by direction of this court, culminating protracted litigation. See State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Seattle & Montana Railroad v. RoederWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. City of Tacoma v. Nisqually Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Sargent v. Inhabitants of MerrimacMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morgan v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ozette Railway Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Finch v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Idaho Farm Development Co. v. BrackettIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API