Longview, Portland & Northern Railroad v. Settle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
An order of necessity having been entered in favor of respondent in condemnation proceedings, a jury was summoned to determine the damages, a trial was had, and the jury returned a verdict awarding damages to appellants in the sum of $19,000. Thereupon respondent filed a motion to reduce the award to $8,000 on the grounds: first, that there was no competent evidence to substantiate an award of $19,000, or any other or greater sum than $8,000; and second, that the award was the result of passion and prejudice. Thereafter respondent moved for a new trial upon practically the same grounds. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
- Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co. v. SlosserWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- North Coast Railroad v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Olympia Light & Power Co. v. Tumwater Power & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. SUP'R CT. FOR SNOHOMISH CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. PrindleWashington Supreme Court · 1932