Legal Opinion

Longview, Portland & Northern Railroad v. Settle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1924No. 18498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

An order of necessity having been entered in favor of respondent in condemnation proceedings, a jury was summoned to determine the damages, a trial was had, and the jury returned a verdict awarding damages to appellants in the sum of $19,000. Thereupon respondent filed a motion to reduce the award to $8,000 on the grounds: first, that there was no competent evidence to substantiate an award of $19,000, or any other or greater sum than $8,000; and second, that the award was the result of passion and prejudice. Thereafter respondent moved for a new trial upon practically the same grounds. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Western American Co. v. St. Ann Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co. v. SlosserWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. North Coast Railroad v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Olympia Light & Power Co. v. Tumwater Power & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. SUP'R CT. FOR SNOHOMISH CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. PrindleWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API