Legal Opinion
Parkdale International, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 11, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-72; Court 06-00289PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Chief Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiffs Parkdale International, Ltd., Riv-erview Steel Co., Ltd., and Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.’s, and plaintiff-intervenor Russel Metals Export’s (collectively, “plaintiffs”) motions for preliminary injunctions to prevent the liquidation of certain entries of goods. 1
Plaintiffs are importers and exporter-resellers of certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products from Canada that are covered by an antidumping duty order. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Prods. & Certain Cuf-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parkdale International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Celta Agencies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Impact Steel Canada Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.