Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 16, 2009No. Slip Op. 09-142; Court 07-00067PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
In response to a demand by the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) for the payment of antidumping duties secured by Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Hartford”) bonds, Plaintiff brings this action, asking the court to declare its bonds unenforceable. Pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(1), Defendant moves to dismiss, claiming a lack of subject matter jurisdiction because of Plaintiffs failure to utilize or exhaust its administrative protest remedies. For the reasons stated herein, the court grants Defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011