Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Parkdale International, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 8, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-122; Court 06-00289PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs Parkdale International, Ltd., Riverview Steel Co., Ltd., and Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd., and plaintiff-intervenor Russel Metals Export (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are importers and exporter-resellers of certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products from Canada. Since 1993, Plaintiffs’ merchandise has been subject to an antidumping duty order. See Certain Cor-rosionr-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Prods. & Certain Cutr-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Canada, 58 Fed.Reg. 44,162, 44,162 (Dep’t Commerce Aug. 19, 1993) (antidumping duty order).…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beijing Tianhai Indus. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  2. Dupont Teijin Films v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  3. Jtekt Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  4. Impact Steel Canada Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API