Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 29, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-132; Court 07-00101PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONALD C. POGUE, Judge.
Faced with a demand by the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) for the payment of antidumping duties pursuant to Plaintiffs bond guaranteeing the payment of such duties, Plaintiff, in this action, asks the court to declare its bond unenforceable. Pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(1), Defendant moves to dismiss, claiming a lack of subject matter jurisdiction because of Plaintiffs failure to utilize or exhaust its administrative protest remedies. For the reasons stated herein, the court grants Defendant’s motion.
Background
This action involves…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- United States v. American Home Assurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.