Legal Opinion
Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 14, 2006No. 06-1044, 06-1052PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIS, District Judge.
This appeal concerns the interpretation of the countervailing duty laws and the division of authority between the two entities responsible for implementing these laws — the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”). In this case, Customs collected duties on 1997 magnesium and magnesium alloy imports at too high a rate from appellee Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. (“NHC”). Rather than liquidate countervailing duties against NHC at the proper 2.02% rate, Customs allowed some duties to be “deemed liquidated” at cash deposit rates…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, Solarworld Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Skf USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Hutchison Quality Furniture, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.