Legal Opinion

United States v. May

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 12, 1998No. 96-0841; Crim.App. No. 94-2027PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of carnal knowledge, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 920. The adjudged and approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence in an unpublished opinion. This Court granted review of the following issues:

I

WHETHER THE NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING APPELLANT’S CONVICTION…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  5. United States v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. FinsterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  3. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  4. United States v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  5. United States v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API