Legal Opinion

United States v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 8, 2004No. 02-0457/ARPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Specialist Brian P. Adams was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial. He was charged with rape and adultery in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934 (2000), respectively. He entered pleas of not guilty to the adultery charge and guilty to the lesser-included offense of attempted rape in violation of Article 80, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 880 (2000). He was found guilty of both adultery and rape. His adjudged and approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  5. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. ChinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  3. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  5. United States v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API