Legal Opinion
Kahn v. Kahn
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 2013No. E054082PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, husband Robert S. Kahn failed to respond to discovery propounded by wife Jessie A. Kahn. Even after the trial court granted Jessie’s motion to compel, he still failed to respond. Finally, after Jessie filed a motion for terminating sanctions, Robert served responses, but they included numerous objections based on the Fifth Amendment.
The trial court struck Robert’s responsive pleading as a discovery sanction and entered his default. It also denied his motion to set aside the default. After a prove-up hearing, it entered a default…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Marriage of LippelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Sickle v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cummings Medical Corp. v. Occupational Medical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Stein v. YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sass v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Faton v. Ahmedo CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Sass v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Martin v. Martin (In re Martin), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Faton v. AhmedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.