Legal Opinion

Sass v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided March 7, 2019No. B283122PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.

*444*1034When a plaintiff files a lawsuit, the defendant can opt not to respond; the result is a default judgment for the plaintiff. ( *1035Code Civ. Proc., §§ 580, subd. (a), 585, subds. (a) & (b).)1 However, the relief awarded in such a default judgment "cannot exceed" the "type and amount of relief" sought in the plaintiff's operative pleadings. ( § 580, subd. (a) ; Becker v. S.P.V. Construction Co. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 489, 493-494, 165 Cal.Rptr. 825, 612 P.2d 915 ( Becker ).) This case presents two unsettled questions: (1) May a default judgment be entered for an amount in excess of the demand in the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sass v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Airs Aromatics, LLC v. CBL Data Recovery Tech. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Pletcher v. Pavlovsky CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Radovic v. Brilliant CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Tolley v. Kobzoff CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API