Cummings Medical Corp. v. Occupational Medical Corp.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
In this action plaintiffs (collectively referred to as Cummings) filed a complaint against defendants (collectively referred to as OMCOA). OMCOA filed a cross-complaint against Cummings. Cummings then filed a cross-complaint against OMCOA. As a sanction for discovery abuse, the trial court struck Cummings’ complaint and cross-complaint and the answer to OMCOA’s cross-complaint. The court entered a default judgment in favor of OMCOA on its cross-complaint. Cummings filed a timely appeal 1 contending the trial court abused its discretion in terminating the actions in favor of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Mike Davidov Company v. IssodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Vallbona v. SpringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Kenly v. UkegawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.